custom writing services

Need more information?: Chat with us


support@myprivateresearcher.com

order download
Average score 4.96 out of 5 based on 673 opinions

International Relations in a Globalizing Era

Please read carefully the assignment guideline below. Make sure you fellow all the provided information correctly.
Assignment
Description Length
Assignment 1750 words
Essay
Write an essay paper of approximately 1750 words (text only) on one of the following topics. Students must include a word count on the title page of their essay. These essay topics have specific subsections with specific word counts and students must write to meet these criteria. Your essay should include a short introduction of 2 to 5 sentences that outlines what your essay will cover and this will be included in the word count of your first section. Your essay will be marked on the basis of the assignment criteria sheet to be found below.
Question One: International Law and war in Afghanistan (see chapter 10 of your textbook)
Just war doctrine can be used to argue that going to war is legitimate. Using the case study of war in Afghanistan from 2002 to the present, write an essay that covers the following points;
• Explain just war doctrine (300-400 words)
• The use of just war doctrine to justify international assistance to President Hamid Karzai’s government in Afghanistan (500-600 words)
• The use of just war doctrine to justify international assistance (ie. by international terrorist groups, Islamist movements, elements in Pakistan) to the Taliban, Al Qaeda and other opponents of the Afghanistan government (500-600 words)
• Conclusion – which has the better argument and why? (200-300 words).
OR
Question Two: What causes armed aggression? (see chapter 7 of your textbook)
Select a conflict (such as Libya 2011, the Sudan struggle for independence, the US invasion of Iraq 2003, the Second World War). Write an essay that covers the following points;
• Explain the background to the conflict (200 words)
• Assess the conflict in terms of individual human nature (200-300 words)
• Assess the conflict in terms of states’ internal characteristics (400-500 words)
• Assess the conflict in terms of the global system (400-500 words)
• Conclusion – which explanation is best for your chosen conflict, and why? (300 words)
OR
Question Three: Nonstate actor – Wikileaks (see chapter 5 of your textbook)
Does Wikileaks share the characteristics of an issue advocacy group and a multinational corporation? Write an essay that covers the following points;
• Describe Wikileaks (300 to 400 words)
• What is a multinational corporation and how does Wikileaks fit this category? (400 – 500 words)
• What is an issue advocacy group and how does Wikileaks match this category? (400 – 500 words)
• Conclusion – which category of nonstate actor best describes Wikileaks? (300 to 400 words)
OR
Question Four: Making foreign policy: maritime asylum seekers in Australia (see chapter 6 of your textbook)
For the last decade, the Australian governments led by Howard, Rudd and Gillard have all taken the steps to limit the entry of asylum seekers by boat. Explain how foreign policy is made in an essay that covers the following points;
• Describe the maritime asylum seeker issue in Australia (300-400 words)
• Impact of individual leaders on maritime asylum seeker policy (400-500 words)
• Global and domestic determinants on maritime asylum seeker policy (500-600 words)
• Conclusion – what has shaped Australian foreign policy in this area? (200-300 words).
Note: Papers should be typed using size 12 font or legibly handwritten (double line-spacing), as well as spell-checked. Please submit this assignment on (or before) the due date so as to avoid possible penalties. All assignments must use Harvard AGPS Referencing. Refer to the USQ library guide for details on this.
If you use different chapters from an edited book such as the recommended book edited by Baylis, Smith and Owens make sure that you reference each source separately. For example, when referencing chapter 3 by Scott and chapter 4 by Cox, they would appear as in text references as follows; (Scott, 2008, p. 58) and (Cox, 2008, p. 84). Then in your bibliography they would also appear as two separate entries. In nearly all instances you would use page numbers for your in-text references.
Plagiarism, or copying another author’s work without referencing it is a serious academic offence, and it is a form of cheating. It may be tempting to cut and copy from online sources and present this work as your own. However, this is very easy for staff to detect, so please do not run the risk of failing on these grounds. For further information on this refer to the following link.
An important note on sources:
When preparing Assignments , students are strongly encouraged to consult and cite at least three relevant books or book chapters, and cite at least three relevant journal articles. Google scholar is a useful tool for searching for journal articles. If students wish to use other non academic Internet sources they are restricted to one appropriate Internet source, other than news articles or government reports. Information on determining the reliability of Internet Sources follows the marking criteria sheets. You must consult and cite relevant academic sources and these sources should be the primary sources from which you draw your information. Do not use Wikipedia or other encyclopaedia as sources for university level work.
Assignment marking criteria
HD (85-100) A (75 to 84) B (65 to 74) C (50 to 64) F (≤ 49%)
Sources/
research You have demonstrated wide scholarly reading through the use of numerous and varied sources of a high scholarly quality. You have clearly employed these sources in your argument and demonstrated sound understanding of, and critical engagement with, these sources. Your sources include many current and up-to-date references. You have used a good number of scholarly sources and demonstrated how your understanding of these sources has informed your argument. A greater variety of sources may have benefitted your essay. Some of your sources may have been improved, perhaps in currency. You have used sufficient sources to demonstrate some informed knowledge of the area; you may have lacked sources for some points that would have been improved by support or your essay may have benefitted from a greater variety of sources. Perhaps some sources are not appropriate for scholarly work. You have used the minimum number of sources; some of your sources may not be appropriate to scholarly work. You may have some points that require sources to support them and you have not provided any. You have not employed enough sources or your sources may be unreliable or unacceptable in scholarly work.
Structure
introduction
main body
conclusion Your essay structure is clear, flows logically and has no superfluous material. Very good work. Your essay structure is logical and well balanced. Your essay structure is good, but you can do more to improve this. Your argument structure is present, but not well defined. The structure could be improved. Your essay needs a clear structure, with introduction, body and conclusion
Expression
grammar
spelling
writing Your writing clearly and powerfully represents your ideas with elegant and concise phrasing and no errors of spelling or grammar. Your writing clearly expresses your ideas in a concise and effective manner; you may have few errors of grammar or spelling. Your writing communicates your ideas, but expression may be improved, it may be too wordy or awkward. You may have some grammatical and spelling errors. What you are trying to say is generally clear; however you may have clumsy expression and several grammatical and spelling errors. What you are trying to say is not always clear; you may have numerous grammatical and spelling errors.
Referencing You have references that are clear and well executed in the correct Harvard format with no (or almost no) errors. You have references that are clear and well executed in the correct Harvard format with minimal errors. Your referencing is mostly present, but may have errors. You may have applied a system of referencing other than Harvard. Your referencing is poorly executed, and needs work. http://www.usq.
edu.au/library/
help/referencing
/harvard
Referencing is not present in you essay.
Analysis/
Argument Excellent examples to advance your discussion. Your analysis was clearly integrated into your argument structure, with high-quality arguments and well supported conclusions. You have used very good arguments that draw on evidence to support your conclusions. You have developed a good argument was well explained and connected to the course themes Your argument could have been more effective, but you have made a sound attempt. Difficult to understand. Unconnected ideas. Lack of support for conclusions
Facts / Topic knowledge A very advanced knowledge of topic content with significant originality Advanced knowledge of topic content with some originality Good knowledge of topic content Sound knowledge of the relevant topic Did not demonstrate knowledge of topic
Important information on using Internet Sources
It is important to note that if you do use Internet Sources they must be carefully selected and you should only use them in conjunction with analytical hard copy sources such as books or journal articles. The sources you use when preparing assignments should reflect a balance.
In addition, it is important that you know about the author of the information on the website so you can determine whether or not they are qualified to write on the issue, who they are representing and what were their motivations for writing the information. If the author is qualified to write on the topic, they will normally have their qualifications listed on the document and you should be able to find other articles or books they have written on the field/topic. If the person is not qualified you will often find that there is no mention or little reference to the author. This should be a warning bell that all is not right with that author and a strong indicator that they are not qualified to write about the field/topic.
If you do use Internet sources when preparing your assignments please consider the following information to ‘select’ reliable and critical sources. The CARS Checklist for Research Source Evaluation.
The CARS Checklist for Research Source Evaluation
Credibility Trustworthy source, author’s credentials, evidence of quality control, known or respected authority, organizational support. Goal: an authoritative source, a source that supplies some good evidence that allows you to trust it.
Accuracy Up to date, factual, detailed, exact, comprehensive, audience and purpose reflect intentions of completeness and accuracy. Goal: a source that is correct today (not yesterday), a source that gives the whole truth.
Reasonableness Fair, balanced, objective, reasoned, no conflict of interest, absence of fallacies or slanted tone. Goal: a source that engages the subject thoughtfully and reasonably, concerned with the truth.
Support Listed sources, contact information, available corroboration, claims supported, documentation supplied. Goal: a source that provides convincing evidence for the claims made, a source you can triangulate (find at least two other sources that support it).
(Source: Information from: Harris, Robert 1997 ‘Evaluating Internet Research Sources’. VitrualSalt. Accessed, 17 October 2001, )
Additional resources
Study materials
Recommended references
Some of the following texts may also be of use in your study:
Baylis, J & Smith, S (eds) 1997, 2001 and 2005, The globalization of world politics: an introduction to international relations, 1st, 2nd and 3rd edns, Oxford University Press.
Capling, A, Considine, M & Crozier, M 1998, Australian politics in the global era, Addison Wesley Longman.
Evans, G & Grant, B 1995, Australia’s foreign relations in the world of the 1990s, 2nd edn, Melbourne University Press.
Fry, G & O’Hagan, J (eds) 2000, Contending images of world politics, Macmillan.
Hanson, M & Tow, W (eds) 2002, International relations in the new century: an Australian perspective, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
Leaver, R & Cox, D 1997, Middling, meddling, muddling: issues in Australian foreign policy, Allen & Unwin.
Lewins, F, Grieg, A & White, K 2002, Inequality in Australia, Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom.
Mackerras, C (ed.) 2000, Eastern Asia: an introductory history, 3rd edn, Longman.
Maidment, R, Goldblatt, D & Mitchell, J (eds) 1998, Governance in the Asia-Pacific, Routledge.
Maidment, R & Mackerras, C (eds) 1998, Culture and society in the Asia-Pacific, Routledge.
McDougall, D 1998, Australian foreign relations: contemporary perspectives, Addison Wesley Longman, Australia.
McGrew, A & Brook, C (eds) 1998, Asia-Pacific in the new world order, Routledge.
Mediansky, F (ed.) 1997, Australian foreign policy into the new millenium, Macmillan.
Milner, A (ed.) 1996, Australia in Asia: comparing cultures, Oxford University Press.
Nester, W 1995, International relations: geopolitical and geoeconomic conflict and cooperation, Harper Collins.
Smith, G, Cox, D & Burchill, S 1996, Australia in the world: an introduction to Australian foreign policy, Oxford University Press.
Seitz, JL 2002, Global issues: an introduction, 2nd edn, Blackwell Publishing, USA.
Snarr, M & Snarr, N (eds) 2002, Introducing global issues, 2nd edn, Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder.
Steger, M 2003, Globalization: a very short introduction, Oxford University Press, United Kingdom.
Viotti, P & Kauppi, M (eds) 1992, International relations theory: realism, pluralism, globalism, 2nd edn, Macmillan.

HOW IT WORKS

  simple order process Pricing order download You have just landed to the most confidential, trustful essay writing service to order the paper from. We have a dedicated team of professional writers who will assist you with any kind of assignment that you have. Your work is handled confidentially with a specific writer who ensures you are satisfied. Be assured of quality, unique and price friendly task delivered in good time when you place an order at our website. banner We have a team of dedicated writers with degrees from all spheres of study. We readily accept all types of essays and we assure you of content that will meet your expectations. Our staff can be reached  via live chat, email or by phone at any given time with prompt response.  

Prices starting at:

High school
Undergrad.(yrs 1-2)
Undergrad.(yrs 3-4)
Master’s
Doctoral
$10 / page
$10/ page
$12/ page
$15 / page
$17/ page

Note: The prices in the table above are applicable to orders completed within 14 days. Kindly see the full price table for more prices..

We urge you to provide as much information as possible to avoid many revisions. Set your deadline, choose your level, give payment information and relax while you track your work. We will deliver your paper on time. . 1 Are you in a quagmire and you are unable to complete your assignments? Do you doubt yourself on the quality of the essay you have written? Myprivateresearcher.com  is here to assist you. We will offer you unmatched quality that is plagiarism free. Place an order at myprivateresearcher.com  for guaranteed  high grades. order download

we offer gifts to our paper help customersPayment Methods

you can request our services and pay via paypal

we offer gifts to our paper help customersOur Guarantees

  1. Zero plagiarism.
  2. 100% confidentiality.
  3. FREE Reference page
  4. High Quality papers
  5. 24/7 Customer support

Our Testimonials Testimonials

I ordered a 7 page college essay and was delivered on time. Thank you guys I will definitely order again!

9.5
, FL

Our statisticsOur Statistics

  • Orders Completed todate 65387

  • Number of writers 246

  • Satisfied customers 98.7%

  • Returning customers 92.3%

  • Orders placed today 204